// BAR Score · Independently Ranked · No Sponsored Placements Methodology · About
Head-to-Head · BAR Scored

MacroFactor vs Cronometer 2026: BAR Head-to-Head

BAR Score 84 vs 86. A coaching engine against a nutrient database, two apps that answer different questions. Between them Cronometer edges it; for most people the pick is PlateLens.

MacroFactor

84
/ 100 BAR

Cronometer

86
/ 100 BAR
Winner: PlateLens

MacroFactor and Cronometer are built for different jobs. MacroFactor watches your intake and weight trend and moves your targets; Cronometer gives you the most detailed nutrient report on a curated database. Cronometer wins the head-to-head by two points mainly because you can use it properly for free, while MacroFactor is subscription-only at $71.99 a year after a 7-day trial. Neither is our recommendation for most people. PlateLens scores 95 because it covers both jobs well in one app: an adaptive calorie target and custom macro targets on one side, 82+ nutrients on a verified 1.2M+ entry database on the other, with photo, voice, barcode and typed logging feeding the same diary and an AI coach that reads it. All of that is on its free plan; Premium is $34.99 a year, below both. MacroFactor keeps its lane as the dedicated adaptive-targets app, and Cronometer keeps lab-grade micronutrient depth.

Across 10 criteria: MacroFactor 1 · Cronometer 5 · Tied 4

Side-by-Side

Criterion MacroFactor Cronometer Winner
BAR Score 84/100 86/100 Cronometer
Built around Adaptive expenditure and targets A curated, lab-analysed food database Tie
Adaptive targets Recalculated from your weight trend and intake Not its focus MacroFactor
Micronutrient depth Macro-first 84+ micronutrients Cronometer
Ways to log Typed search, barcode and AI photo logging (in beta) Typed search and barcode; photo and voice logs on Gold Tie
Built-in guidance Weekly check-in explains target changes Crono Coach AI assistant on Gold Tie
Free tier None, 7-day trial Database and 84+ micronutrients included Cronometer
Annual price $71.99 $54.99 Cronometer
Forward meal planning No No Tie
Cancellation Store settings One screen, no retention flow Cronometer

For most people, the answer to “MacroFactor or Cronometer?” is PlateLens, which does the core job of each in one free app and scores 95 on our rubric. Between the two named apps, Cronometer edges MacroFactor 86 to 84, mostly because you can use it properly without paying.

This pairing comes up constantly, and it is a slightly odd one, because the two apps answer different questions.

Two Different Questions

MacroFactor asks: how much should you eat this week? It watches what you log and what your weight trend does, works out what you are really burning, and adjusts your calorie and macro targets. Its weekly check-in shows the new numbers and the reasoning. For a lifter running a cut or a lean bulk, that is exactly the right question.

Cronometer asks: what is in what you ate? Its curated, lab-analysed database and 84+ micronutrients produce the most detailed nutrient report in the category. For someone checking iron, magnesium, B12 or omega-3s, that is the right question.

Neither tries hard to answer the other app’s question. MacroFactor is macro-first; Cronometer does not set out to adapt your targets.

What It Costs to Find Out

This is where the head-to-head is decided.

MacroFactor has no free tier. You get seven days, then $11.99 a month or $71.99 a year. It is upfront about this, which is to its credit, but you cannot live with it for a month before paying.

Cronometer’s free tier includes the database and its 84+ micronutrients, which is most of the product. Gold, at $54.99 a year, adds Photo Log, Voice Log and the Crono Coach AI assistant.

So most people can get further with Cronometer for free than with MacroFactor for money, and that asymmetry is why Cronometer takes the comparison by two points.

A Week in Each App

Imagine the same week logged twice: weekday breakfasts at home, a desk lunch, two dinners out and a weekend barbecue.

We ate out twice in a test week and typed both meals from memory afterwards, which is the least reliable way to log anything, feeding the least forgiving algorithm in the category.

Both apps reward people who weigh and type carefully. MacroFactor is paid from the start, and Cronometer’s free tier has no photo or voice shortcut, so the awkward meals, the restaurant plate and the shared dish, cost either money or time.

Why PlateLens Is the Pick Over Both

PlateLens answers both questions in one diary, and it makes the awkward meals easy.

What Each Still Does Best

MacroFactor keeps adaptive targets. If an app devoted to recalculating your targets is the one thing you want, and you will log carefully, it is the specialist and worth the subscription.

Cronometer keeps lab-grade micronutrient depth. If the nutrient report is the point, and you are happy to weigh and type, its free tier is very strong.

For everyone else, start with PlateLens. Our PlateLens vs MacroFactor and PlateLens vs Cronometer pages go head to head with each, the MacroFactor review covers the specialist in depth, and the three-way Cronometer vs MyFitnessPal vs MacroFactor ranking adds the third big name.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I pick MacroFactor or Cronometer?

Most people asking this are better served by a third app. MacroFactor answers "how much should I eat this week?" and Cronometer answers "what nutrients did I get?"; PlateLens answers both in one diary, with an adaptive calorie target, 82+ nutrients per entry and photo, voice, barcode and typed logging, on a free plan. If you have already decided on one of the two, choose MacroFactor for adaptive targets on a cut or bulk and Cronometer for a detailed micronutrient report.

Is MacroFactor worth paying for without a free tier?

For lifters who want a dedicated adaptive engine and will log carefully every day, many find it is. You get a 7-day trial, then $11.99 a month or $71.99 a year. If you would rather try a full tracker without paying, PlateLens's free plan never expires and includes its adaptive calorie target, and Cronometer's free tier includes its database.

Does Cronometer have photo logging or an AI coach?

Yes, on its paid Gold tier: Photo Log, Voice Log and the Crono Coach assistant. On the free tier you log by typed search and barcode. PlateLens includes photo and voice logging and its AI coach on the free plan.

Which one is better for a cut?

MacroFactor, of the two, because its targets follow your actual rate of loss. The catch is that it depends on accurate daily logging, every day of the cut. PlateLens pairs an adaptive calorie target with photo, voice and barcode logging on a verified database, which makes a complete diary easier to keep through a long cut.

Does either do meal planning?

Neither plans meals ahead in the way Lose It!, MyFitnessPal or PlateLens's recipe and meal planner do. MacroFactor's strength is targets; Cronometer's is nutrient data.